[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#68981: dpkg: runs ldconfig way too often



severity 68981 wishlist
reassign 68981 dpkg
thanks

>>"Josip" == Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr> writes:

 Josip> On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 03:44:08PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:

 >> Post-install ldconfigs should be taken over by dpkg.  ldconfig
 >> should only be run once at the end of an install, or prior to
 >> installing packages that pre-depend on newly-installed libraries.
 >> This would substantially reduce install times that are being
 >> slowed down by redundant ldconfig calls.

 Josip> Since dpkg only runs ldconfigs that are invoked from package
 Josip> postinst scripts, the packages would have to changed[1]. That
 Josip> would have to become a policy decision first, I think.

	Umm. I think we should have a mechanism in place before we
 change policy. And we can't just change policy and have all the
 packages using ldconfig sudenly become non-compliant; we need to have
 a transition strategy, in which we accept that not all packages shall
 be transitioned for a period.

	Indeed, at a minimu, we need a dpkg that runs ldconfig, or
 implements a post install hook mechanism (triggers), or something,
 before this becomes a policy issue.

	Policy should follow, not ead, a transition like this. Indeed,
 we should have a working model/pilot hammered out and tested before
 writing policy about it, since the design would well change during
 implementation.

	I am sending this back to dpkg as a wishlist item

	manoj
-- 
 "Committees do harm merely by existing." Freeman Dyson
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: