Bug#69311: PROPOSAL] Finishing the /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc transition.

To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, 69311@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#69311: PROPOSAL] Finishing the /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc transition.
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Date: 20 Aug 2000 19:24:37 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87snrzmpfe.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
Reply-to: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>, 69311@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: Santiago Vila's message of "Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:16:34 +0200 (CEST)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000817114630.5783B-100000@cantor.unex.es>

Hi,

        I think I must object to this proposal. I think nothing good
 can come out of this hastening of the planned transition; espescially
 since no good reaso is given as to why we must sccelrate the
 transition process. What is wrong with the plan currently in place?

	manoj
-- 
 You're ugly and your mother dresses you funny.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#69311: PROPOSAL] Finishing the /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc transition.
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

References:
- Bug#69311: [PROPOSAL] Finishing the /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc transition.
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Bug#69487: the example for using nostrip in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is incorrect
Next by Date: CVS srivasta: Added must/should/may stuff, typo fixes in the policy and rules files, as well as updating the symlink before lib handling in dpkg language
Previous by thread: Bug#69311: PROPOSAL] Finishing the /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc transition.
Next by thread: Bug#69311: PROPOSAL] Finishing the /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc transition.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread