Bug#27137: REJECTED] Clarification of non-free: packages encouraging donations with claims about non-donation

To: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>, 27137@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#27137: REJECTED] Clarification of non-free: packages encouraging donations with claims about non-donation
From: Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:21:50 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000706182150.A9320@molehole.dhis.org>
Reply-to: Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>, 27137@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000705000524.G3040@polya>; from J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk on Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 12:05:24AM +0100
References: <20000620164237.A1035@polya> <20000625132156.A25550@aziraphale.demon.co.uk> <[🔎] 20000705000524.G3040@polya>

On 04-Jul-00, 18:05 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> wrote: 
> So are people happy with changing the wording of the last two lines to
> read:
> 
>    otherwise they must go in non-free.
> 

FWIW, I'm happy with that.

steve greenland

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#27137: REJECTED] Clarification of non-free: packages encouraging donations with claims about non-donation
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Treat plugins and shared libraries differently
Next by Date: Processed: merge duplicate Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Previous by thread: Bug#27137: REJECTED] Clarification of non-free: packages encouraging donations with claims about non-donation
Next by thread: Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Treat plugins and shared libraries differently
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread