Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority
From: Guy Maor <maor@debian.org>
Date: 22 Mar 1999 08:46:37 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87bthltqtu.fsf@femto.dyn.ml.org>
In-reply-to: Santiago Vila's message of "Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:16:21 +0100 (CET)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990322131130.8838A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:

> Good idea, but if we redefine standard, dselect will install a lot of new
> packages by default.

Good point.  I guess we need a new priority after all.


Guy

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority
Next by Date: Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority
Previous by thread: Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority
Next by thread: Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread