Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Chris Waters wrote:
> I think people are becoming too ready to propose grand, sweeping
> changes to policy in order to fix obscure, minor problems.
I agree.
> If you *really* want something in policy, I'd suggest: "the package
> description should list the binaries (or at least, the main binary) if
> it doesn't match the package name." Then, you can use dpkg --info.
Yuck. Package descriptions shouldn't become dumping grounds for every peice
of information about a package. The sole purpose of a package description is
to let you decide if you should install/remove a package.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: