[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#45318: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 07/10/1999] Amend contrib definition)



Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000 (GMT)
with message-id <E11kD9q-0000Vf-00@polya>
and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 1999 04:44:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 627 invoked from network); 17 Sep 1999 04:44:08 -0000
Received: from murphy.debian.org (209.41.108.199)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 1999 04:44:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 16908 invoked from network); 17 Sep 1999 04:32:00 -0000
Received: from azure.humbug.org.au (mail@203.24.22.40)
  by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 1999 04:32:00 -0000
Received: from aj by azure.humbug.org.au with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
	id 11RpXR-0007Q8-00; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:22:21 +1000
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:22:20 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Ammend contrib definition
Message-ID: <19990917142220.A28410@azure.humbug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre1i
Organisation: Lacking
X-PGP: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc


--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist

Nothing seemed to come of the April debian-policy thread about contrib
[0], but there seemed to be a very loose consensus that section 2.1.3
(definition of "contrib") should be changed.

So I'd like to propose that:

] 2.1.3. The contrib section
] --------------------------
]=20
]      Every package in "contrib" must comply with the DFSG.
]=20
]      Examples of packages which would be included in "contrib" are
]         * free packages which require "contrib", "non-free", or "non-US"
]           packages or packages which are not in our archive at all for
]           compilation or execution,
]         * wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
]           programs,
]         * packages which we don't want to support because they are too
]           buggy, and
]         * packages which fail to meet some other policy requirements in a
]           serious way.

=2E..be changed to...

] 2.1.3. The contrib section
] --------------------------
]=20
]      Every package in "contrib" must comply with the DFSG.
]=20
]      Examples of packages which would be included in "contrib" are
]         * free packages which require "contrib", "non-free", or "non-US"
]           packages or packages which are not in our archive at all for
]           compilation or execution, and
]         * wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
]           programs.

That is, that the only consideration about whether a package should be
added to main, contrib or non-free be its licensing terms.

Packages that are `too buggy to support' or `fail to meet policy
requirements in a serious way' should either be fixed (ideally), or not
included in Debian at all.

Cheers,
aj

[0] See: http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-policy-9904/msg00192.h=
tml

--=20
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.

 ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it=20
        results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
                                        -- Linus Torvalds

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: GZnDVghlJt72w0I7m3HZmBSYuYwEIdnQ
Comment: Key available at http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc

iQCVAwUBN+HB++RRvX9xctrtAQFauQP/WmOP7MIu2Z61IXGE8jlXUOW5T4HXe9dk
5zkdmJYn3mXy684LutOa3iOeaYd95ZfmzoHTmpCnA8BX4I7caCOF05gZe33JrGbL
AKv/XRYdnJmk0nMSWRoJnY6fE3MhAuFpKf0D986C558DsGBgfaVJQBvyFNEMBL9w
3MBTLaMjjVA=
=hmJ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 45318-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 1999 21:31:45 +0000
Received: (qmail 17140 invoked from network); 6 Nov 1999 21:15:11 -0000
Received: from mserv1c.u-net.net (195.102.240.33)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 1999 21:15:11 -0000
Received: from [195.102.196.44] (helo=polya)
	by mserv1c.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #35)
	id 11kD9x-0005Qp-00; Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:14:05 +0000
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
	id 11kD9q-0000Vf-00; Sat, 06 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000
Subject: Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0
To: 8221-done@bugs.debian.org, 17621-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 19179-done@bugs.debian.org, 24695-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 32448-done@bugs.debian.org, 32449-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 33076-done@bugs.debian.org, 40766-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 40767-done@bugs.debian.org, 41095-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 41121-done@bugs.debian.org, 41232-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 41547-done@bugs.debian.org, 41829-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 42358-done@bugs.debian.org, 42447-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 42849-done@bugs.debian.org, 43651-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 44620-done@bugs.debian.org, 44643-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 44922-done@bugs.debian.org, 45307-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 45318-done@bugs.debian.org, 45561-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 46516-done@bugs.debian.org, 48570-done@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000 (GMT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E11kD9q-0000Vf-00@polya>
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

These bugs have been fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0; changelog follows.

   Julian

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg


Changes: debian-policy (3.1.0.0) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * Add instructions on /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc symlinks (closes:
    #45561, #42447, #48570)
  * Added source dependencies (closes: #41232)
  * Deprecated /etc/rc.boot (closes: #32448, #32449)
  * Update-rc.d now only legal way to automatically access /etc/rc?.d
    directoried (closes: #41547)
  * FHS compliant location of examples (closes: #42849)
  * Added ispell-dictionary to virtual-packages.list (following new
    suggestions: no objections => accept) (closes: #8221)
  * Added man-browser to virtual-packages.list (closes: #24695)
  * Added ident-server to virtual-packages.list (closes: #45307)
  * Alphabeticised virtual packages list ;)
  * Corrected GPL reference in proposal.sgml
  * Clarification of "extra" priority (closes: #33076)
  * Remove buggy and seriously problematic licenses from list of contrib
    package criteria (closes: #45318)
  * Move docs to /usr/share/doc with a compatibility symlink (closes:
    #41829)
  * Update to FHS 2.1 draft #3 (for /var/state etc. changes).
  * Correct /var/lib/games -> /var/games (closes: #42358)
  * Added MIME subpolicy (closes: #46516)
  * Added support for VISUAL (closes: #41121)
  * Clarify non-dependence on /usr/local (closes: #44922)
  * Modified description of mail spool locking (closes: #43651)
  * Clarified wording of conffiles and configuration files (closes:
    #40766, #40767)
  * Changed description of release numbers (closes: #44620)
  * Added changelog.html -> changelog requirement (closes: $40934)
  * packaging-manual now correctly installs its docs (closes: #44643)
  * The packaging manual now discusses version numbers based on dates
    (closes: #17621)
  * Mention ls -f for testing order in which files appear on disk (closes:
    #19179)
  * Change order of '.' and '+' in description of version numbers (closes:
    #41095)
  * s/fields/field names/ in section 4.1 of packaging manual for clarity
  * Add Build-Depends-Indep: field to control file


Reply to: