Bug#33076: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 1999/02/08] Clarification of "extra priority")
Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000 (GMT)
with message-id <E11kD9q-0000Vf-00@polya>
and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Feb 1999 12:33:57 +0000
Received: (qmail 31355 invoked from network); 8 Feb 1999 12:33:53 -0000
Received: from pizarro.unex.es (root@158.49.8.2)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 1999 12:33:53 -0000
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (root@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
by pizarro.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA15693
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 13:24:31 +0100
Received: from cantor.unex.es (sanvila@cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105])
by guadiana.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA26870
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 13:24:30 +0100
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 13:24:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Debian Bugs <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: [PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990208131536.7307A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: debian-policy
There has been a long discussion about the exact meaning of the words
"higher priorities" in the definition of extra priority:
"This contains packages that conflict with others with higher priorities,
or are only likely to be useful if you already know what they are or have
specialised requirements."
I propose that we clarify this by saying explicitly which are the
priorities higher than extra. The modified wording would be:
"This contains packages that conflict with others with required,
important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be
useful if you already know what they are or have specialised requirements."
I am now looking for seconds for this proposal.
--
"99660fc1a5ef008b14975d9aff96a6f3" (a truly random sig)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 33076-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 1999 21:31:44 +0000
Received: (qmail 17140 invoked from network); 6 Nov 1999 21:15:11 -0000
Received: from mserv1c.u-net.net (195.102.240.33)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 1999 21:15:11 -0000
Received: from [195.102.196.44] (helo=polya)
by mserv1c.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #35)
id 11kD9x-0005Qp-00; Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:14:05 +0000
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11kD9q-0000Vf-00; Sat, 06 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000
Subject: Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0
To: 8221-done@bugs.debian.org, 17621-done@bugs.debian.org,
19179-done@bugs.debian.org, 24695-done@bugs.debian.org,
32448-done@bugs.debian.org, 32449-done@bugs.debian.org,
33076-done@bugs.debian.org, 40766-done@bugs.debian.org,
40767-done@bugs.debian.org, 41095-done@bugs.debian.org,
41121-done@bugs.debian.org, 41232-done@bugs.debian.org,
41547-done@bugs.debian.org, 41829-done@bugs.debian.org,
42358-done@bugs.debian.org, 42447-done@bugs.debian.org,
42849-done@bugs.debian.org, 43651-done@bugs.debian.org,
44620-done@bugs.debian.org, 44643-done@bugs.debian.org,
44922-done@bugs.debian.org, 45307-done@bugs.debian.org,
45318-done@bugs.debian.org, 45561-done@bugs.debian.org,
46516-done@bugs.debian.org, 48570-done@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000 (GMT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E11kD9q-0000Vf-00@polya>
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
These bugs have been fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0; changelog follows.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Changes: debian-policy (3.1.0.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add instructions on /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc symlinks (closes:
#45561, #42447, #48570)
* Added source dependencies (closes: #41232)
* Deprecated /etc/rc.boot (closes: #32448, #32449)
* Update-rc.d now only legal way to automatically access /etc/rc?.d
directoried (closes: #41547)
* FHS compliant location of examples (closes: #42849)
* Added ispell-dictionary to virtual-packages.list (following new
suggestions: no objections => accept) (closes: #8221)
* Added man-browser to virtual-packages.list (closes: #24695)
* Added ident-server to virtual-packages.list (closes: #45307)
* Alphabeticised virtual packages list ;)
* Corrected GPL reference in proposal.sgml
* Clarification of "extra" priority (closes: #33076)
* Remove buggy and seriously problematic licenses from list of contrib
package criteria (closes: #45318)
* Move docs to /usr/share/doc with a compatibility symlink (closes:
#41829)
* Update to FHS 2.1 draft #3 (for /var/state etc. changes).
* Correct /var/lib/games -> /var/games (closes: #42358)
* Added MIME subpolicy (closes: #46516)
* Added support for VISUAL (closes: #41121)
* Clarify non-dependence on /usr/local (closes: #44922)
* Modified description of mail spool locking (closes: #43651)
* Clarified wording of conffiles and configuration files (closes:
#40766, #40767)
* Changed description of release numbers (closes: #44620)
* Added changelog.html -> changelog requirement (closes: $40934)
* packaging-manual now correctly installs its docs (closes: #44643)
* The packaging manual now discusses version numbers based on dates
(closes: #17621)
* Mention ls -f for testing order in which files appear on disk (closes:
#19179)
* Change order of '.' and '+' in description of version numbers (closes:
#41095)
* s/fields/field names/ in section 4.1 of packaging manual for clarity
* Add Build-Depends-Indep: field to control file
Reply to: