Re: Source dependencies: are we ready?

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Joel Klecker wrote:

> At 14:42 +0200 1999-10-27, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > I doubt gcc works without ldso ;-)
> 
> Sure it does, it's not a libc5 executable.

Ooops! I forgot that libc6 uses its own dynamic linker.
Why is ldso still essential, then?

Maybe it should be just required in potato, and its extended description
should be changed so that it does no longer read "It is required by any
program that uses shared libraries.".

Thanks.

-- 
 "b303ad623fdaffaed997eb8c60f627a2" (a truly random sig)