Bug#37254: dpkg: update-alternatives madness

[Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>]

> Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Do we need to then specify this in the policy manual, or will it be
> > sufficient to file bugs against packages which don't have the needed
> > update-alternatives in their prerm?
> 
> No need to put this in the policy manual. The policy manual is for
> policies, not for guidelines to make packages.
> 
> Wichert.

So I'm reassigning back to dpkg.

   Julian

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg