Re: Bug#47438: copyright statement needs updating?
Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> writes:
> So what should it say? Would an extra line:
> Copyright (c)1998,1999 Debian Policy List Members
> be appropriate?
IANAL, but I believe that only a legally recognized entity (person,
organization, whatever) can assert copyright.
When Manoj asked me to assign copyright of my just-accepted proposal,
I responded, "sure, just tell me how." I'm still waiting to hear. :-)
Note that the FSF, which has more experience (and better lawyers) than
most of us, requires formal transfer of copyright to all patches and
whatnot. I'd *hope* that we wouldn't have to go that far, but I think
we're wading into murky waters here. (Murky is a cousin of mine.:-)
Perhaps we could a) arrange for the policy copyright to be transferred
to SPI, and (or) b) state in the proposal-policy that making a formal
proposal implies assignment of copyright. I dunno if it would hold up
in court, but with luck, it'll never come to that.
--
Chris Waters xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
Reply to: