Re: static user IDs
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au> wrote:
> In article <[🔎] 19990919103259.A656@wonderland.linux.it> you write:
> >Please provide a rationale. Some of my packages need a static ID (64000
> >is assigned, the only one assigned so far) because their spool could
> >need to be NFS shared.
>
> As the maintainer of diskless, I am curious:
>
> What packages need a ID that could be shared over NFS? ie what
> packages *need* a static ID?
My understanding was that static IDs were for packages that did include the
code to support dynamic IDs. There is no really reason at all for a package to
have a static ID.
--
I consume, therefore I am
Reply to: