Re: Policy about policy
> Raul> (a) documenting existing practice, and
> Raul> (b) getting approval from relevant package developers, and
> Raul> (c) getting the technical committee to approve (or disapprove) a
> Raul> completed proposal, and
> Raul> (d) getting the developers as a whole to overturn a technical committee
> Raul> decision.
On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 03:48:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If this is all this mailing list can do, I do not think that
> the process is worth the effort, personally.
Could you expand on this a bit?
Reading the proposal document, I'm guessing that you're saying that
point (a) is too narrow, or you're objecting to the idea that point (b)
is important. [You can't be objecting to point c -- that's already in
the proposal document. Though perhaps you have a different definition of
"contentious" than I do. And given what little you've expressed here
I don't think you're objecting to point (d).]
--
Raul
Reply to: