[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#42052: PROPOSAL] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail



On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 08:18:45PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > To do this I suggest we ammend policy first by replacing all existing
> > instances of /var/spool/mail with /var/mail and then changing the second
> > paragraph of section 5.6 which currently reads
> 
> I object to this proposed change on the following grounds:
> 
> There are no reasons for us to change.  The FHS made a gratuitous
> change in this area.  If someone wants to install software that really
> does require /var/mail to exist they can make the symlink themselves.
> 
> There are reasons for us not to change: it is hard to do right, as the
> discussion has shown, and if we get it wrong we risk making people's
> mail systems fall over or even losing mail.

Creating a symlink is not hard.  It does not lose mail.  It does not harm
the system.

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>             Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77  8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Knghtbrd> xtifr - beware of james when he's off his medication  =>

Attachment: pgpTslNqJayfT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: