On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 07:11:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > First, this is horrible and abhorrent, and unversioned libraries shouldn't > > ever happen, and other packages shouldn't start depending on them and > > icky icky icky icky ewww. > > Maybe I'm just being simple, but couldn't one simply modify the binary to > include a soname? Isn't it just a section/field in the ELF structure and > entirely settable after compilation? hex editing ELF's with perl hacks (sed won't cut it) is EVIL! I actually am setting this up for LD_PRELOAD, but still I need dpkg-shlibdeps not to die and abort building of the package just because it doesn't know how to handle an unversioned shlib. -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux developer GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77 8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <Wordplay> You measure your vibrators in "characters per second"? I have bad news for you, c90, you've been masturbating with a dot-matrix printer.
Attachment:
pgpvxNObuTeE5.pgp
Description: PGP signature