Re: virtual package 'ispell-dictionary'
> Hi,
> >>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> writes:
>
> >> What exactly is required to "resurrect" a proposal? Is it required to wait
> >> some amount of time since it was rejected?
>
> Julian> I don't know. Sufficient interest might be sufficient, but
> Julian> we should
> Julian> ask Manoj.
>
> Umm. What would people say to having to ask for seconds all
> over again, and an expectation that there would be an explanation why
> the proposer thinks that the new proposal is likely to succeed when
> the old one did not? (I don't want to have us mandate that, but it is
> reasonable, is it not?)
>
> So, if folks agree to this, I would say that we need the
> proposer and seconds (and an explanation) in place before the status
> of the bug is changed. Comments?
The old proposal was made years (?) ago, and died among the others
which were expired due to lack of interest. And now here's some
interest. If it's formally proposed again, I'll second it.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Reply to: