Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
[Okay, I'm getting overexcited. I'll just shut up now, since I'm
going on vacation for the next three days. ;)]
>>>>> Gordon Matzigkeit writes:
I should have though more before I wrote. Here's what I *meant* to say:
No package needs Conflicts and Replaces. They are just shorthands for
Exclusive (a Provide that conflicts with every other Provide of the
same name):
A Conflicts B == A Exclusive C, B Exclusive C
A Replaces B == A Exclusive B
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@fig.org> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
Reply to: