Re: Maintainership, vanishing or absent maintainers (QA)
John Lapeyre wrote:
> *Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I'm trying to revive Debian QA. With the growing number of new
> > maintainers showing interst in general QA for Debian it seems useful
> > that one of the 'old' maintainers shows direction.
> Longer descriptions of charters for the mailing lists would be nice. In the
> archives, QA is simply described as 'quality assurance'. A long
> description available with the detailed tasks listed would probably stir
> some activity.
I have just put my -devel+-qa mail back into my fold document to
edit and repost it later, so please help me defining things.
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
-- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.