[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority

On 17-Mar-99, 12:33 (CST), Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk> wrote: 
> Ideas I have had so far are:
>    Usual
>    Common
>    Better
>    Good
>    Useful
>    Widespread
>    Commended

Common. This has no more value judgement than the existing priorities,
and is fairly obviously between Standard and Optional. Usual runs
a close second. Widespread seems awkward, and the rest have value
connotations that I don't think we want.


Reply to: