[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority

Guy Maor <maor@debian.org> writes:

> If our intent is that practically all systems install Standard and
> higher, do we really need four tiers there?  Let's broaden important
> so it includes our current standard software and redefine standard as
> Ian suggested the new priority be defined.

I think this is a better idea, too.


Reply to: