Re: Size of Optional - policy and name for new Priority
Ian Jackson wrote:
My vote is for "Typical".
* Atypical packages aren't inferred to be bad packages.
* Microsoft has spent the last decade or so training us that "Typical" is
a rather bloated install that has just about everything you need. This
seems like what we want.
Not commended, unusual, bad, not useful, and worse, the antonyms of a few of
the other things listed above, have rather negative connotations.
Robert Woodcock - firstname.lastname@example.org
"I never knew manipulating the masses was so easy." -jt