Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Jules Bean <email@example.com> writes:
> On 25 Feb 1999, James Troup wrote:
> > > Giving the package maintainers more control over the overrides for
> > > their own packages seems a good strategy. Can you tell us why this
> > > approach was abandoned earlier?
> > How about because a certain developer would be free to NMU like it was
> > going out of fashion to ``fix'' crushingly urgent priority bugs?
> That's not a reason, is it?
I don't believe it is, either.