Bug#33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Ok. To make it fully clear, I hereby change my earlier proposal to
> this one:
>
> extra
>
> "This contains all packages that conflict with others with required,
> important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be
> useful if you already know what they are or have specialised requirements."
>
>
> The difference with respect to the previous proposal is merely the
> addition of the "all" word, as suggested by Stephen Zander, so that it is
> clearly understood that whenever a package fits this description, it has
> to be of extra priority.
>
>
> [ Mmm, do I need seconds again? ]
You probably do.
In any case, I second this new propsal.
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: