[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mechanism for removing developers



On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously John Goerzen wrote:
> > 1. There should be policy against ignoring bugs for an excessive amount of
> > time without good reason (eg, vacation)
> 
> This is silly: for example I have a couple of ancient open bugs for
> strace for which I don't really have a clue how to solve them and an
> upstream maintainer who doesn't answers emails weeks later (if at all).
> Frankly I fear those bugs may never be fixed.

Maybe not fixed, but if sent to the upstream developer, they should be
marked as 'forwarded'. ;)

-- 
- Vincent RENARDIAS  vincent@{{ldsol,pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux:   http://www.openhardware.org    Logiciels du soleil: -
- http://www.fr.debian.org    Open Hardware:         http://www.ldsol.com -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-"Microsoft est à l'informatique ce que le grumeau est à la crépe..."     -


Reply to: