Bug#32229: PROPOSED] libc-dev dependency in non-libc -dev packages

[Ben Collins <bmc@visi.net>]

On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 02:40:03PM -0800, Joel Klecker wrote:
> At 21:55 +0000 1999-01-21, James Troup wrote:
> >If this is really a problem which needs addresses, libc6-dev (and
> >equivalents) _must_ providing something other than libc-dev.
> >(glibc-dev maybe?)  Anything else is worse than ugly.
>
> OK, proposal is amended to use `glibc2-dev' as the dependency.

Sounds good, my second for the proposal stands with that ammendment.

--
-----    -- - -------- --------- ----  -------  -----  - - ---   --------
Ben Collins <b.m.collins@larc.nasa.gov>                  Debian GNU/Linux
UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems Inc.                 bcollins@debian.org
------ -- ----- - - -------   ------- -- The Choice of the GNU Generation