Re: Relation with non-existing packages
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> > I disagree with this proposal. Packages in contrib and non-free
> > should be able to depend on packages that we can't or won't distribute
> > for whatever reason.
>
> Why would we want to define relations within Debian packages to packages
> that don't exist as far as we are concerned?
Example: There is no pine.deb but a pinepgp package should be
allowed to depend on it.
I agree with Richard Braakman.
--
"e35c195de6d00e28a1aac16381c75028" (a truly random sig)
Reply to: