RE: Constitution not packaged!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Why not the debian-doc package with the social contract, manifesto, et al?
On 14-Dec-98 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was planning to reread the constitution yesterday and discovered
> it is not packaged. We clearly need to fix that. I suggested to
> Adam Harris that he include it in developers-reference, and he
> said he would rather see it in debian-policy. Personally I think
> either is fine, although I slightly prefer developers-reference.
>
> So we decided to ask for your input on this..
>
> Wichert.
>
> --
> ==============================================================================
> This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
> E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl
> WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------*
* Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ *
* <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ *
* -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------*
=========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNnSMmrbps1lIfUYBAQEU2AQArOwA6eI5KanQAIsUO/vfemwtOC3WlNrz
jJ7KCVjEfMZHcSceQmXhsUL1T5JiGBvjNedEU3GfQYcmrmN2wO71kPZzh2Tf39s9
42FoSuuN2hI07gzgI5rzoCNrAN20IFz91BfofVk8AqYXooHXn44R35ocXMCblWrK
1gbZqED9UQQ=
=p1H8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: