Re: DFSG and GPL -- source retention
> > One issue that's come up: we're currently doing nothing to guarantee
> > that we're distributing source for three years after binaries have been
> > shipped on GPLed code.
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca> wrote:
> We do for things we have officially released. If you look on va there
> is an archive of all releases back to rex, I could get buzz as well
> I'm told.
Really? What urls should I look at?
> The sources we do not have come from version skew between the ports and
> interm releases on the path to being stable. I'm not sure this is good
> enough, but keeping every tar.gz we ever put out for 3 years is NOT
> feasable.
Even if we restrict special source retention treatment to those packages
with a source availability clause and even though many of our versions
are patches, not complete archives?
--
Raul
Reply to: