Re: md5sums
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Optional perhaps? md5 hashing chews up a minor amount of time compared to
> the actuall disk io, especially when you do it as the data is flowing into
> the file you are writing.
I'll belive the author of apt knows what he's talking about on this one. :-)
> Putting it in dpkg means that automagically evey package suddenly has
> valid md5sum files.
The only problem with that is it means <gasp> modifying dpkg. :-)
> I booted linux on a embedded intel 386-33 without a coprocessor :> Fun
> Fun.
I currently have the 4th and 8th slowest linux machines listed in the
BogoMips HOWTO:
Intel 286 Tandy 0.75 Joey Hess <joey@kite.ml.org>
Intel 386 PS2 2.34 Joey Hess <joey@kite.ml.org>
Dpkg would actually run on the PS2, I think. If it had more than 2 mb or ram.
:-)
--
see shy jo
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: md5sums
- From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
- Re: md5sums
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@wgolden-gryphon.com>