Re: Proposal Announce Processes
On Tue, 1 Sep 1998, Darren Benham wrote:
> I'd say announcing it to the "general" developer public would be a courtesy if
> nothing else. There might be an issue that someone feels important enough (or
> important enough to his packages) that he'd want to participate but not, in
> general, be a part of ALL policy discussions.
Well, an option which presents itself is the creation of a policy-announce
group. The policy-announce group would be used to post formal proposals
and CFVs, maybe (and results).
Personally, I don't think that this is necessary, since I feel that
developers who care about policy should read the group, and those who
don't should be content to 'toe the line'. However, if someone else were
to propose a scheme like that above, I wouldn't vote against it.
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: