Re: libtime-period-perl: Doesnt this belong in libs rather than interpreters?

To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libtime-period-perl: Doesnt this belong in libs rather than interpreters?
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 06:45:41 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980627064541.Q9094@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87pvfxa60c.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>; from Manoj Srivastava on Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 09:52:03AM -0500
References: <199805312054.NAA30279@bittersweet.inetarena.com> <24949.898735130@eeyore.ibcinc.com> <[🔎] 87btrhinm7.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com> <[🔎] 87pvfxa60c.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> 	There was a suggestion that a new section be created for Perl
>  libraries; and populated with stuff from CPAN. I think that may not
>  be a bad idea.

I agree (but not for hamm).

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: libtime-period-perl: Doesnt this belong in libs rather than interpreters?
  - From: karlheg@inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)
- Re: libtime-period-perl: Doesnt this belong in libs rather than interpreters?
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Isn't cc the default compiler?
Next by Date: Re: Isn't cc the default compiler?
Previous by thread: Re: libtime-period-perl: Doesnt this belong in libs rather than interpreters?
Next by thread: Revision file
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread