Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...

[Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>]

> >         foo-1.2.2                foo-1.2.2-1
> >                                  foo-1.2.2-2
> >         foo-1.2.3alpha           foo-1.2.2.99.1-1
> >                                  foo-1.2.2.99.1-2
> >         foo-1.2.3beta            foo-1.2.2.99.2-1
> >                                  foo-1.2.2.99.2-2
> >         foo-1.2.3                foo-1.2.3-1

Argh.  Typos.

Should of course read:

> >         foo-1.2.2                foo_1.2.2-1
> >                                  foo_1.2.2-2
> >         foo-1.2.3alpha           foo_1.2.2.99.1-1
> >                                  foo_1.2.2.99.1-2
> >         foo-1.2.3beta            foo_1.2.2.99.2-1
> >                                  foo_1.2.2.99.2-2
> >         foo-1.2.3                foo_1.2.3-1

...

> There is some merit to including the full upstream version somewhere in the
> number.
> 
> Something along the lines of
> 
> foo-1.2.2-1.2.3alpha-1

In which case, this comes out as 

> foo_1.2.2_1.2.3alpha-1

I presume ?

which seems fair enough to me, if you like that sort of thing.  Both examples 
could be included, and the maintainer could then choose.

Cheers, Phil.



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org