Re: Bug#19048: cvs-buildpackage: they should use /bin/sh and not bash

To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
Cc: Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: Bug#19048: cvs-buildpackage: they should use /bin/sh and not bash
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 19:26:48 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980307192346.839A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87pvjy9yag.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On 7 Mar 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

> using /bin/sh is just waiting for a problem to occur,

Oh, yes, removing the /usr/spool symlink is also waiting for a problem to
occur...

That argument does not convince me at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBNQGRXiqK7IlOjMLFAQH4WwQAsqdZLlnKx8uWXCaFcKKVV8ykr8MbAN7g
Ho8hFQgUESJQRRu8pjoZWkxDqFAh6V11Edc0pyqTiMEJ1gyZGzF3hzSEQf19L9lg
3I7d/NA49ppDdHJnoPs+zyYBjVpErkwuRgt9bR1heHG0STAAHWuTRi0sGlqS5yPp
E+cAC9emfT8=
=Zc0E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#19048: cvs-buildpackage: they should use /bin/sh and not bash
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Extending version numbering (Was: glibc_2.0.7pre1-3)
Next by Date: Re: Bug#19048: cvs-buildpackage: they should use /bin/sh and not bash
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#19048: cvs-buildpackage: they should use /bin/sh and not bash
Next by thread: Re: Bug#19048: cvs-buildpackage: they should use /bin/sh and not bash
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread