On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > That still leaves in the dependency on the physical maintainer. It also
> > makes the information in the Packages file authoritative for the
> > maintainer information. This is Bad for several reasons, only one of them
> > being that the Packages file might be outdated.
>
> The database is created out of the .dsc files, regenerated daily.
That's not the point I think. I guess he refers to the Maintainer field in
Debian packages. I am sure it is not widely known that there exists a mail
alias "package@packages.debian.org" to the maintainer...
cu
Torsten
Attachment:
pgpWka1sDX3Bz.pgp
Description: PGP signature