Re: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.

To: shaleh@livenet.net, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Cc: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.
From: Martin Schulze <joey@tapiola.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 16:49:57 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19981211164957.C8626@tapiola.infodrom.north.de>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] XFMail.981211103302.shaleh@livenet.net>; from Shaleh on Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 10:33:02AM -0500
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.981211144920.15583E-100000@pc47.mpn.cp.philips.com> <[🔎] XFMail.981211103302.shaleh@livenet.net>

Shaleh wrote:
> Nifty idea.  Kinda like it. My only beef is that the "user" must know to mail
> libgtk1.1.7@packages.debian.org rather than gtk@packages.debian.org or
> libgtk@packages.debian.org.

There is a cute mechanism that foo@packages and foo1@packages both
work, so for regular libraries this issue is resolved. Gtk is a 
special case where it is not resolved, though.

> I know Brian will be thankful for having an Imlib mailing list.

See my last mail re this issue.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Linux - the choice of a GNU generation

Please always Cc to me when answering on the lists.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.
  - From: Brian Almeida <bma@debian.org>

References:
- Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.
  - From: joost@pc47.mpn.cp.philips.com
- RE: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.
Next by Date: RE: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.
Previous by thread: RE: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.
Next by thread: Re: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread