[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#29955 closed



Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> writes:

>      If indeed people think that the version numbers of two
>  different packages should remain in sync, please justify having them
>  as separate packages in the first place.
> 
>      If you think that this is what you want to do please peopose
>  this as a policy amendment, seek seconds, and ewither proceed to
>  merge the two packages, or justify the requirement as a policy
>  change.
 
     I was seeking to have what I thought was policy enforced, not to
propose a new policy.  My recollection was that parallel version
numbers were mentioned as policy by Christian Schwarz last spring.  It
is apparent that either my memory is faulty or the policy group
suffers from collective selective amnesia.  Since the latter is
unlikely, it must be my memory at fault.

>      Lacking such a move, I move that we close this report.

     Agreed, and done.

Bob
-- 
   _
  |_)  _  |_       Robert D. Hilliard    <hilliard@flinet.com>
  |_) (_) |_)      Palm City, FL  USA    PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9


Reply to: