Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
Date: 01 Nov 1998 02:13:42 -600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87emrng79l.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>
In-reply-to: Santiago Vila's message of "Fri, 30 Oct 1998 12:32:41 +0100 (CET)"
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981030122817.3084A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

Hi,
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:

 Santiago> [ I would suggest to make "YYYYMMDD" the recommended choice
 Santiago> in this case,points are not allowed in ISO dates, only
 Santiago> hyphens or nothing, I think ].

	Fine by me A new proposal coming up..

 >> I am now looking for seconds for this proposal.

 Santiago> I would propose to discuss this minor point first.

	This could easily be hammered out in the discussion period
 too, you know. 

	manoj
-- 
 Frankly, Scarlett, I don't have a fix. Rhett Buggler
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#25911: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 98.09.24] Policy 5.5 (Log files) should be moved)
Next by Date: Re: Bug#17621: PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Previous by thread: Bug#25911: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 98.09.24] Policy 5.5 (Log files) should be moved)
Next by thread: Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread