Re: Proposal: Reject packages that violate policy
On 13-Oct-98 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I am inclined to trust the current method of having a human
> actually do rejects. The afore mentioned human may, of course, use
> the services of lintian in deciding whether or not to reject the
> package; I would be inclined to support a policy violation being
> sufficient cause for rejection.
>
I was talking with one such human in IRC today and he basicly said he'd get
chewed out since there is no policy to reject packages because they break
policy...
- Darren
P.S. forgive me, it's late and I'm passing tired and into silly
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------*
* Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++*
* * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ *
* <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ *
* -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------*
=========================================================================
Reply to: