On Sat, Oct 10, 1998 at 04:47:33AM -0400, Adam P. Harris wrote:
>
> I formally second the proposals in the BTS as 26461, 25385, and 21185.
Hehe, thank you, but you're a month or so late. You'll notice
they made it to [AMENDMENT] status on 9/24, and had the discussion
period expire without objection earlier this week. I just forgot to
put in a reminder to the policy implementors to actually implement
them.
So here it is, I guess: Please Implement Now :)
> I feel that the section shuffling proposed in Bug#25911 is just a
> nicety, and we should officially endorse a non-section-number related
> method of indicated Policy Sections before we start shuffling all this
> around.
Well, like I said, the period for objection and discussion of this
expired already, so you'll need to make this a new proposal.
> I also urge Zed, in the future, to not lump together proposals in this
> way. It confuses the issue...
Sorry. This was actually a one-shot thing done in a lump package
because all four were (I thought at the time, anyway) pretty trivial
corrections to make that weren't likely to draw a lot of discussion.
Oops. It worked anyway, though, so I guess no harm done this time.
===========================================================================
Zed Pobre <zed@va.debian.org> | PGP key on servers, fingerprint on finger
===========================================================================
Attachment:
pgphZPRLWJzM_.pgp
Description: PGP signature