Re: Kachina Technologies as a maintainer

To: John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.Arizona.EDU>, Ward Deng <wdeng@KachinaTech.COM>
Cc: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>, Johnie Ingram <johnie@netgod.net>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kachina Technologies as a maintainer
From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 05:14:03 +0200
Message-id: <19980923051403.E8153@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.03.9809181351060.5778-100000@newton.physics.arizona.edu>; from John Lapeyre on Fri, Sep 18, 1998 at 02:08:27PM -0700
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980917131533.12883A-100000@ruby.intranet.kachinatech.com> <Pine.OSF.4.03.9809181351060.5778-100000@newton.physics.arizona.edu>

John Lapeyre wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, Ward Deng wrote:
> 
> wdeng>We really intend take over some numerical/scientific
> wdeng>applications. However, none of us here are official Debian
> wdeng>developers. We are asking question if a company can be a
> wdeng>developer and nobody seems to know the answer.

The easiest way would be for each of you to apply as maintainer
and maintain the packages as a group - which is not yet allowed
by policy.  *sigh*

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
*** Fatal Error: Found [MS-Windows], repartitioning Disk for Linux ...

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kachina Technologies as a maintainer
  - From: jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl

References:
- Kachina Technologies as a maintainer
  - From: John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.Arizona.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: Call for Seconds, Take II
Next by Date: Re: {PROPOSAL} #7890: Policy manual contradicts itself about including docs
Previous by thread: Kachina Technologies as a maintainer
Next by thread: Re: Kachina Technologies as a maintainer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread