Re: Choosing release goals for slink
James Troup <james@nocrew.org> writes:
> > (btw severity "important-ish" means severity normal to the BTS - see
> > #24255)
>
> Duh; I'm well aware of that, I used it for that reason. Please stop
> being so damn condescending and also stop telling me what to do; I'll
> do what I want, not what you want.
I was pointing it out, in case you were unaware of it.
So much for the other points I made about outstanding bugs you had filed,
but not fixed yet, it seems that 3 maintainers are not enough and you'll
leave Brian to do everything.
> "Technical grounds"? Your initial was so vague it would be impossible
> to oppose it on technical grounds; you're only now beginning to flesh
> it out in any way. My reasons, again, for your benefit are:
It was vague at the time, but you dismissed it too hastily.
> o Lots of effort for no or at best minimal gain. So people can
> remove their own packages. So what? That is one tiny facet of
> ftp.debian.org, as the bugs against ftp.debian.org show.
It is nevertheless a facet, and would free the ftp.debian.org maintainers
to fix more important problems like incomplete Packages files.
> o I don't see anyone offering to implement this. Do you expect Guy to
> do it?
No, I'm not asking anyone to do it, I shall volunteer, unless someone else
would prefer to do it.
Martin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: