Re: Bug#21969: debian-policy: needs clarification about Standards-Version
- To: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>, Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Cc: Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>, 21969@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#21969: debian-policy: needs clarification about Standards-Version
- From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 19:42:10 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19980504194210.X1819@test.legislate.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>, Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>, Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>, 21969@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19980504193405.61047@flora>; from Marcus Brinkmann on Mon, May 04, 1998 at 07:34:05PM +0200
- References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980504181236.1258A-100000@cantor.unex.es> <[🔎] 19980504193405.61047@flora>
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
> I don't think the wording does leave room for any interpretation. You are
> free to read it in native english or in english written by a german guy,
> you still get the same meaning: Out of w.x.y.z, the first three have to be
> coorect (w.x.y) while the fourth can be ignored.
Of course, stated this way it's ambiguous. [Who may ignore the fourth:
the person supplying, or the person interpreting the version number?]
However since it's a comment in a changelog rather than in the policy
manual, the program source (diffs) should be considered authorative on
what change was actually made.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: