[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#21969: debian-policy: needs clarification about Standards-Version



Hi,
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:

Santiago> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 2 May 1998, Manoj
Santiago> Srivastava wrote:

>> Packages only have to specify the first three digits of the version
>> number in the `Standards-Version' field of their source packages.

Santiago> "only three" is "three".

	If anything had said "only three", you would have been
 correct. Happily, this happens not to be the case.

Santiago> I fully agree with Martin in that "if 'at least 3' was
Santiago> intended, it would undoubtedly have been specified".

	I think this may not really translate well into non english
 languages. it is not "only three", it is "*only have to specify*
 three", which is not the same thing at all (please ask a native
 speaker of the language if you are not convinced).

	Secondly, this is the changelog, poeople, this is not policy. 

	As some one pointed out; you only have to get 50% to pass does
 not mean that anyone getting more than 50% fails. Think about it.

	In light of this discussion, I think my point about adding a
 clarifying paragraph is proved; the langage construct obviously
 bothers some non-native speakers of the language. 

	However, since we do not have a policy editor anymore, all
 this is moot, since policy is now unchanging and therefore dead.

	manoj
-- 
 If you're already in a hole, there's no use to continue digging. Roy
 W. Walters
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: