Re: symlinks and transitive dependencies?

To: Branden Robinson <branden@purdue.edu>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: symlinks and transitive dependencies?
From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>
Date: 25 Apr 1998 13:01:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] dmm90oudsal.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: Branden Robinson's message of "Sat, 25 Apr 1998 02:41:06 -0500"
References: <[🔎] 19980425024106.C11189@purdue.edu>

Branden Robinson <branden@purdue.edu> writes:

> Is this okay?

See the bug logs for #19562.  Apparently indirect dependencies are not
allowed.

-- 
James


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Indirect dependencies
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

References:
- symlinks and transitive dependencies?
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@purdue.edu>

Prev by Date: manpages maintainer now accepting some section 1 manpages.
Next by Date: Re: conffiles versus configuration files
Previous by thread: symlinks and transitive dependencies?
Next by thread: Indirect dependencies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread