Re: Is it a bug to call /usr/bin/X11/foo in the postinst?

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>
Subject: Re: Is it a bug to call /usr/bin/X11/foo in the postinst?
From: Brian Mays <bem5r@watt.seas.virginia.edu>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1998 19:57:11 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] E0yLdkG-0001mK-00@tick.virginia.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Apr 1998 09:52:44 +1000." <[🔎] 199804042352.JAA12382@gondor.apana.org.au>

Upon further reflection and experimentation, I have decided to end
this discussion by implementing rxvt's alternative method through
/usr/X11R6/bin.  The problem that I discussed in my previous post can
be avoided by an aptly timed removal of the X11R6 alternative.

Brian


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Is it a bug to call /usr/bin/X11/foo in the postinst?
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Is it a bug to call /usr/bin/X11/foo in the postinst?
Next by Date: IMPORTANT: calling ldconfig in maintainer scripts
Previous by thread: Re: Is it a bug to call /usr/bin/X11/foo in the postinst?
Next by thread: IMPORTANT: calling ldconfig in maintainer scripts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread