Re: syslinux: main or contrib?

To: Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: syslinux: main or contrib?
From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>
Date: 17 Feb 1998 21:31:08 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] dmm1zx1536r.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: Adam Klein's message of "Tue, 17 Feb 1998 10:36:08 -0800"
References: <[🔎] 19980217164415.41890@salmon.etsit.upm.es> <[🔎] 19980217103608.16111@eskimo.com>

Adam Klein <aklein@eskimo.com> writes:

> nasm is in the main distribution.  Should it not be?

No.  See #14859

-- 
James

Reply to:

References:
- syslinux: main or contrib?
  - From: Juan Cespedes <cespedes@debian.org>
- Re: syslinux: main or contrib?
  - From: Adam Klein <aklein@eskimo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: syslinux: main or contrib?
Next by Date: Re: manpages for X11 games?
Previous by thread: Re: syslinux: main or contrib?
Next by thread: /usr/lib/perl5 -> /usr/share/perl5 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread