Re: awk: essential virtual package?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 16 Feb 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The only bug is that the base-files maintainer dropped the
> depends line without understanding the consequences.
The base-files maintainer asked Christian about the issue, who then asked
in debian-policy, and NOBODY answered saying "yes, this is the right
thing to do", so he then removed the depends line because it had not been
discussed.
Should I then suggest the base-files maintainer a little more of
"understanding" and a little less of "asking in the lists first"? ;-)
I don't think so...
Thanks.
BTW: I also agree that awk should be essential, so if I don't hear
any objections, I will file that bug report against base-files, if nobody
else does it...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNOi3WCqK7IlOjMLFAQFyPAP9Enq4CsrWyjUUHyrCyKpMgJUe0MwS7rMU
6UxNzScLAO0X0WNju554bium+58gcDeOT6kVorjq9GPyeoVGcEWQGNv5+T7LRyfj
HcyTLur44Bey5HFnkIBCdrXSw3hkTakoOJCBwFsnnmWRwp0PgWVvRAo93Dpw3ZT/
QV+AKsOJjhE=
=JTSt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: