Re: awk: essential virtual package?

To: Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>
Cc: Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: awk: essential virtual package?
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
Date: 09 Feb 1998 12:00:07 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87lnvk4q1k.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>
In-reply-to: Christian Schwarz's message of "Mon, 9 Feb 1998 10:45:35 +0100 (CET)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980209103543.17105D-100000@monet>

Hi,

	Can we haveessential virtual packages? I was under the
 impression that to do so one made a real essential package depend on
 the said virtual package (which descibes the current situation).

	manoj
-- 
 "Neighbors!!  We got neighbors!  We ain't supposed to have any
 neighbors, and I just had to shoot one." Post Bros. Comics
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: awk: essential virtual package?
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

References:
- awk: essential virtual package?
  - From: Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>

Prev by Date: Re: #17544: /var/preserve does not exist
Next by Date: md5sums files (was Re: over 30000 bugs in our archive (!))
Previous by thread: awk: essential virtual package?
Next by thread: Re: awk: essential virtual package?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread