schwarz@monet.m.isar.de (Christian Schwarz) wrote on 13.01.98 in <[🔎] 199801132234.XAA04260@klee.painters.schwarz-online.com>: > To prevent having to use epochs for every new upstream version, > the version number should be changed to the following format in > such cases: `96-05-01', `96-12-24', and starting with the year > 2000 `2000-12-24'. I'd say it should at least be optional to use 4 digit years instead. MfG Kai