bash should not be essential
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Ian Jackson wrote:
> If you want to change the policy and say that bash shouldn't be
> essential then please come to debian-policy and we'll talk about it.
I want to change the policy. I think bash should not be essential.
> It might be worth considering how many packages currently use bashisms
> in places where only an essential package will do.
Will file * | grep "Bourne-Again" serve?
Perhaps we should analyze all shell scripts and report bugs first.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNGn4siqK7IlOjMLFAQGCZQP/ZpakoYgplAHDYXSsobmXchL4VVSGaWGv
frR18L+OF9IdBEmz7DBjSrEMAcwkuWv2VdO/NjX3mSnJ3UJk7vUf1WDmeb42tNu+
O0ijtL/Ar8qotVDWRqBef5Zw+rOchzWWY8os0yUBnc9runT8sgPFbTpTJ9WrFnn8
7qyt8S+0/zE=
=inPy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: