Re: Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.0 (fwd)
On Wed, 5 Nov 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 1997 at 09:03:14PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > what about this :
> > the new to-be 2.1 distribution should be empty (not all these symlinkls
> > to the old hamm tree), and only real new packages with fhs should go
> > there.
>
> I just joined this list; can somebody point me at
> (a) a copy of the new FHS (which is a replacement for the FSSTND?), and
> (b) a rationale for its changes.
>
> For example, from what I've picked up so far, usr/doc is changing
> to usr/share/doc. That doesn't sound a particularly worthwhile
> change to me at present, so I would like to read a rationale for the changes.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
--
Scott K. Ellis <storm@gate.net> http://www.gate.net/~storm/
Reply to: